Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Organisational Skills in Academic Writing: A Study on Coherence and Cohesion in Pakistani Research Abstracts

The Silent Problem in Academic Writing

Every researcher knows the feeling: you have groundbreaking data, but conveying it clearly feels like a constant struggle. The manuscript is structurally sound, the grammar is correct, but something is still missing. Your ideas don't seem to flow the way you want them to.

The missing ingredient is often organizational skill, which in academic terms, translates to mastering coherence and cohesion.

We're excited to announce the publication of our research article, "Organisational Skills in Academic Writing: A Study on Coherence and Cohesion in Pakistani Research Abstracts," which delves into this very topic. By analyzing how researchers in Pakistan link their ideas, we uncovered a critical habit—and a clear path for writers everywhere to level up their work.

Inside the Study: What We Examined

Our goal was to peek behind the curtain of expert academic writing. Specifically, we wanted to know: What cohesive devices do Pakistani researchers rely on most, and what functions do those devices serve?

To find the answer, we compiled a corpus of 50 research abstracts from two prominent Pakistani research journals. Using linguistic analysis software, we cataloged and analyzed every instance of cohesive items (the linguistic "glue" that holds sentences and ideas together).

The results were enlightening.

Key Finding: The Cohesion Champion is Reference

When it comes to linking sentences, we found one device dominating the field: reference items.

Reference items include words like:

  • Pronouns: it, they, their

  • Demonstratives: this, that, these

  • The definite article: the

Pakistani writers used these items most frequently. They primarily serve a directive or referential function—they point back to something already mentioned in a preceding sentence.

This heavy usage ensures syntactic cohesion, meaning the text flows smoothly from one sentence to the next. This is a foundational skill, and it’s one that writers in Pakistan (and many other L2 contexts) have clearly mastered.

The Critical Gap: Syntactic vs. Semantic Flow

Here is where the major takeaway lies for all academic writers:

While reference items create excellent syntactic cohesion (linking sentences), they can sometimes fall short in establishing deep semantic coherence (linking the ideas and meaning across paragraphs).

Imagine a chain:

  • Syntactic Cohesion ensures all the individual links are perfectly connected.

  • Semantic Cohesion ensures the entire chain is connected to the heavy object you’re trying to lift (your core argument).

Our research suggests that while sentence-to-sentence linking is strong, there's a need to move toward organizing text at the deeper, conceptual level.

The Next Step to Mastery: Use Reiteration

If you want your research paper to be truly well-organized and persuasive, focus on moving beyond the heavy use of reference and consciously employ reiteration devices.

Reiteration is the strategic use of synonyms, near-synonyms, or the simple, consistent repetition of key terms throughout your abstract and manuscript.

  • Example of Reference Focus (Syntactic): "The study examined organizational skills. They were analyzed using a corpus."

  • Example of Reiteration Focus (Semantic): "The study examined organizational skills. The analysis of these organizational skills used a corpus."

By deliberately bringing back the core noun phrase (like "organizational skills"), you reinforce the main topic, create a clear conceptual thread for the reader, and solidify the overall semantic structure of your argument.

Final Thoughts

Organizational skills are not just about following a template; they are about using language strategically to make your research accessible and impactful. Our study shows that while writers are strong at linking sentences, the next step is mastering the art of linking ideas.

Take a look at your next abstract. Are you relying on it and this? Or are you strategically repeating the core concepts your work is built upon?

You can read the full article here: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040092

Read PDF: Download

Google Scholar: Link     

Posted by 

Dr. Ali Raza Siddique

PhD Applied Linguistics
Department of Applied Linguistics
Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.